SP500 Overvalued

Jeremy Grantham puts fair value at 880 on the S&P 500. That seems a bit precise. Let's call it 900.

So the SP500 is about at least 100 points overvalued at this point. I think all this momentum seems to be priced into the market. Any earnings warnings or shortfall will get crushed. So proceed with caution at this point.

A number of employment will be out during the next three days. I'll be watching to see how they compared to estimates.

Manpower Earnings Q2 2009

Earnings came out. The earnings was fair considering the environment. Stablization in the US, Italy, and France. Weakness in Australia and some other European nations.

Manpower has done a fairly good job containing cost, and has been buoy by Right Management this quarter. However, although third quarter wise is suppose to be Manpower's strongest quarter; margins will come down due to Right Management seasonal decline.

From AP:

"Co issues in-line guidance for Q3, sees EPS of $0.07-0.21 vs. $0.18 consensus."

From Zacks:

"Management provided a cautious outlook for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. On a consolidated basis, it expects revenues to decline between 29% and 31% in reported dollars (24% to 26% in constant currency)."

So forward guidance is a bit iffy on the EPS front. I'm still a bit tepid with the valuations of Manpower when its peers are not receiving as much of a premium as MAN.

P/E excluding extraordinary items at 66x earnings as of July 24, 2009.

While the PEG is over 11x.
Net Profit Margin at 0.03%

Besides that as the chart presents that this stock is well overbought. When net income is down as much as it has the run up has not been justified. Even as they beat estimates this does not reflect a rebound in employment.

I find this extremely expensive vs. its peers. The stock is pricing in a recovery. If for some reason there is a "W" shaped recovery MAN is going to decline. Remember that employment is a lagging indicator to a recovery.

China's stimulus-fueled stock boom alarms Beijing

"But while investors expect the market -- up more than 80 percent this year -- to keep rising, Chinese leaders are alarmed. They worry that too much of the $1 trillion lending binge by state banks that paid for China's nascent revival was diverted into stocks and real estate, raising the danger of a boom and bust cycle and higher inflation less than two years after an earlier stock market bubble burst.

Beijing is trying to tighten credit controls without derailing the economic revival or causing a market crash -- a risky path at a time when Chinese leaders say a recovery is not firmly established.

"It's a very serious threat. The Chinese government is walking a tightrope," said Mark Williams, Asia economist for Capital Economics in London. "There is the question of what happens if they rein in lending, because there is really no strong evidence that private sector demand is picking up."

"Above 3,000 points, the benchmark index is just in the process of blowing a bigger and bigger bubble," said Wen Lijun, an analyst for Nanjing Securities. "It is just excessive liquidity and no other reason."

Source: AP

Unemployment Insurance Data Summary

http://www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/content/data_stats/datasum09/DataSum_2009_1.pdf

This a great site from the government (United States related) for those that are unemployed and want to look at a comparison of how their state is fairing versus the rest of the nation.

Very helpful if you feel that you are nearing the exhaustion of your benefits.

What recession?

Present economic conditions in the United States from Ritholtz:

• Unemployment has risen;
• Wages continue to slide;
• Industrial production has fallen every month;
• Deflation continues to stalk many asset classes;
• Credit availability is weak, lending standards are tight;
• Capacity utilization is at a very low rate of 68%;
• Retail sales (other than gasoline price increases) are soft

As stated the economic bottom hasn't been hit, and growth has been returning although at a very sluggish rate. Credit is still tight, hence the lack of private sector growth. Government spending can temporary provide a cushion against additional downside but it can not continue its debt ridden balance sheet.

Wages will continue to be under pressure as demand has not returned to from the 2007 peak. Hence the increase in savings and tepid spending by the consumer.

Valuations

David Rosenberg in his latest piece stated the following:

"He wonders, moreover, whether the March 6 lows in the stock market were the real McCoy. Although, in contrast to us, Dave persists in keeping an open mind, he’s doubtful that they were. On March 6, he recounts, the market was trading at two times book, with a 13 times multiple on forward earnings and a P/E of 18 on trailing earnings, and a 3% dividend yield. Pretty rich valuations by all three measures of earnings, but pretty skimpy on yield, to rate as a true market low.

And today, after a 45% rise, the metrics, to dip into the Street cliché, are positively mind-boggling. The dividend yield on the S&P 500, Dave notes, is a meager 2¾%, and payouts so far this year have lagged some 32% behind last year’s not-exactly-torrid pace.

In a like astounding vein, he observes, the trailing P/E on operating earnings (adjusted, he explains, “to take out everything that is bad”) is now at 24 times, while — and if you have a queasy stomach you can skip this number — on trailing reported earnings, the multiple is a mere 760-plus!

“Something tells us,” Dave sighs, “that the marginal buyer of equities today at that price may well be the same person who was loading up on real estate during the summer of ‘06.”

Standard and Poor's Overvalued

After a 40+% gain from the March lows on sub par volume, the S&P 500 seems overvalued relative to the current conditions in the economy. With companies beating on the EPS front due to cost cutting and reduction in head cut, revenue has been for the most part has not matched top end expectations. Hence, although the worst may have come and gone, we are still not out of the woods in terms of excess in the financial markets. With this added global stimulus program, we maybe in for another bubble to burst with the Chinese Shanghai markets up over 90%.

Clearly there is a lag from what actually happens with the economy and the stock market, however if we continue to buy at this point we may find ourselves paying over what the historical value is in the market.